Aug
16
Federally Mandated Increased Down Payments for Home Mortgages?
Posted by amayarealtygroup under Ask a REALTOR, For Buyers, For Realty Professionals, For Sellers, General Information, RE/MAX
The Great Debate: Increased Down Payments
As the QRM (Qualified Residential Mortgage) debate continues, let’s take a look at what this really means. Most politicians who support the QRM proposal, have publicly stated their support is simple. Increased minimum down payment standards will decrease the likelihood of future defaulted loans. That seems to be the consistent answer out of anyone’s mouth who discusses the benefits of QRM and mandatory 20% down payments.
How would an increased down payment really reduce the national default rate?
Per an article written on a hardship foreclosure web site, the five top reasons for foreclosure are the following:
1) Loss of Job
2) Predatory Lending
3) Divorce
4) Medical Illness
5) Buying a Home Before Sale of Existing Home
Now, lets go back to our political answer regarding the value of increased minimum down payment standards; because it decreases the likelihood of default.
1) A job loss results in reduced or no income, therefore, an increased down payment upon purchase would not reduce the likelihood of default. Actually, a decreased down payment with increased cash access would have reserve funds to pay the mortgage while hunting a new job.
2) Predatory Lending if approving buyers for greater amounts than what they can afford. An increased down payment, on a increased purchase price, is still above affordability levels and would not offer any assistance and keep this customer from suffering a default.
3) Divorce- This creates a potential loss of one of the incomes used to qualify. A increased down payment offers no help when half the income used to purchase the home is no longer used to pay the monthly payment.
4) Medial Illness would force all accessible funds contributed toward the health of the client and not the mortgage payment. There is no value in the minimally reduced monthly savings a larger down payment would create.
5) Buying a Home Before Sale of Existing Home- Cash assets are a requirement in this situation because having to pay two mortgages can cause a financial hardship if the rented property becomes vacant. Again, I see no value in what an increased down payment would accomplish on the purchase of the new home to avoid potential default in this example.
Taking the top five scenario’s that lead to foreclosure, I’m glad to see our political leaders have this right when protecting our clients from future default or foreclosure. It always a good idea to call your local political leaders with this vital information and express your opinion regarding potential future regulation. A 20% down payment requirement has zero to do with the overall protection of the client and everything to do with the overall protection of the lien holders ability to liquidate the property.

Comments (0)